Comments on: NQC 06: Caught on (digital) tape http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/ Criticism and commentary on southern gospel music and culture Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:46:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3 By: Dean Conklin http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-280 Dean Conklin Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:30:05 +0000 http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-280 Chuck's comments about preparation and "I am better than this" are interesting. A lot of times the SUBJECTS of interviews feel the same way, but we judge them anyway.+ Chuck’s comments about preparation and “I am better than this” are interesting. A lot of times the SUBJECTS of interviews feel the same way, but we judge them anyway.+

]]> By: Chuck http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-260 Chuck Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:14:53 +0000 http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-260 Yes.. it was kind a fluff type interview.. wasn't it? I am surprised Douglas didn't attack my "good guy" style.. and my generic Q&A in this piece. Looking back.. I agree... I was not prepared. I would like to do another interview.. perhaps even via email. I am better than this. I gave Avery a break.. and he probably didn't expect it. Chuck Yes.. it was kind a fluff type interview.. wasn’t it? I am surprised Douglas didn’t attack my “good guy” style.. and my generic Q&A in this piece. Looking back.. I agree… I was not prepared. I would like to do another interview.. perhaps even via email.

I am better than this. I gave Avery a break.. and he probably didn’t expect it.

Chuck

]]> By: RK http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-252 RK Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:38:01 +0000 http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-252 What, no interview with Southern Spin Radio??? What, no interview with Southern Spin Radio???

]]> By: Scott http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-250 Scott Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:19:09 +0000 http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-250 But subtle clues abound, such as you saying you didn't want YOU to be the focus of the work, etc. That informs a good bit of the early stuff on the site--the anonymity, etc. I mean, were people really expecting you to reveal the nuclear launch codes or the hidden ingredient in Kentucky Fried Chicken? But subtle clues abound, such as you saying you didn’t want YOU to be the focus of the work, etc. That informs a good bit of the early stuff on the site–the anonymity, etc.

I mean, were people really expecting you to reveal the nuclear launch codes or the hidden ingredient in Kentucky Fried Chicken?

]]> By: Smells http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-246 Smells Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:26:05 +0000 http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-246 Correction. Forewarned is a better word that prepared. Thanks Correction. Forewarned is a better word that prepared. Thanks

]]> By: Smells http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-245 Smells Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:25:05 +0000 http://averyfineline.com/2006/09/17/nqc-06-caught-on-digital-tape/#comment-245 How disappointing! I was really expecting to hear some bigger words. All I got was, disjointedness, empatisis, and obviousness. Did you really have to add ness to obvious to make it seem larger? HAHA I'm assuming that Chuck was not prepared for the interview, no offense, because I as a regular reader didn't learn anything new. How disappointing! I was really expecting to hear some bigger words. All I got was, disjointedness, empatisis, and obviousness. Did you really have to add ness to obvious to make it seem larger? HAHA I’m assuming that Chuck was not prepared for the interview, no offense, because I as a regular reader didn’t learn anything new.

]]>