Bloggerheads
David Bruce Murray pops the cork on a little get together of sg bloggers this weekend. I really don’t know what to expect (kickboxing? Kum Ba Yah around a campfire? Thumb wrestling? Earl Grey and biscuits served on lace doilies?) so I don’t really have much to add. Other than that getting there and back will account for some radio silence in the next few days.
Email this Post
e.c. wrote:
Let some of us recording people that are not in NC know the results.
Posted 08 Mar 2007 at 8:53 pm ¶
Sandy wrote:
No unthanks invited? None of their names begin with a “D”
Posted 08 Mar 2007 at 9:47 pm ¶
Angel wrote:
Boy, this news has Chris Unthank’s knickers all in a twist!
Posted 09 Mar 2007 at 12:16 am ¶
J.J. Moore wrote:
That’s exactly what I was thinking, Angel!
Posted 09 Mar 2007 at 11:21 am ¶
Mark Kinnaird wrote:
Poor Chris Unthank. Well they probably needed a litlle more level-headed people to speak on behalf of SGM fans.
Posted 09 Mar 2007 at 5:06 pm ¶
CVH wrote:
Just don’t drop any cigar ashes on the big leather chairs…bad form. What’s next? Blogapalooza?
Posted 09 Mar 2007 at 7:53 pm ¶
Grigs wrote:
Are you going to wear the bag to the meeting?
Posted 09 Mar 2007 at 9:09 pm ¶
Daniel J. Mount wrote:
Grigs–I wish he would’ve tried that. It would’ve been fun.
Posted 09 Mar 2007 at 9:49 pm ¶
Sue Smith wrote:
Maybe Crossroads wants to tell some of the bloggers to get their acts together. I’m not a be fan of DMB. I think he shares his opnion too much. I will normally pass everything he writes.
Posted 10 Mar 2007 at 12:57 pm ¶
Sue Smith wrote:
Sorry..I meant DBM!!!
Posted 10 Mar 2007 at 12:58 pm ¶
Grigs wrote:
Sue, with all due respect, and if you’re the songwriter Sue Smith, I’ve been a fan for 15 years, a blogger/music reviewer who didn’t share his/her opinion would defeat the purpose. I don’t always agree David, but at least he’s fair, knowledgeable, and isn’t a rumor monger. He also doesn’t spout off about things he knows little about or try to psychoanalyze or provide unsolicited counseling to people that he’s never met. I can’t say that about everybody that does what he does.
Posted 11 Mar 2007 at 3:52 am ¶
Sue wrote:
I guess with such a common name, there is bound to be more than one Sue Smith. I’m the songwriter Sue Smith, but when I post here, I simply use my first name. Just wanted to clarify.
Posted 11 Mar 2007 at 3:54 am ¶
Charles Brady wrote:
So when do we get the blow by blow account? I saw that the thread at Singing News had already been dismantled and southerngospelblogger has already taken out the editing knife to his original report… so what is it that brings such a silence into the rooms of talk? Glad I saved a copy of the posts before it all disappeared…
Posted 11 Mar 2007 at 4:59 am ¶
GospelMusicFan wrote:
Thanks for the clarification from the songwriter who wrote reply #12.
Here the info on this songwriter:
http://web.mac.com/suecsmith/iWeb/Site/About%20Sue.html
Posted 11 Mar 2007 at 4:03 pm ¶
David Bruce Murray wrote:
Charles,
If I’d realized there would be this much interest in the meeting, I’d have taped it, packaged it, and sold copies.
Posted 21 Mar 2007 at 1:49 am ¶