SN Fan awards show down
Is it possible the NQC board unilaterally decided to move the Singing News fan awards from Thursday night to Saturday afternoon and to charge $20 a head for it - without consulting the SN? That’s what I’ve been hearing, anyway. And Kenneth Kirksey of the SN confirms as much. The only thing else he’d say was “that we are currently working with the NQC board to come up with a mutually agreeable day and time for the fan awards. I expect we’ll have something to announce in the next couple of weeks.”
From other conversations I’ve had with various stakeholders recently, I gather that after word of NQC’s action got out and SN and the INSP network (which has broadcast rights to the fan awards) responded less than favorably, NQC’s negotiating position softened a bit so that now a Saturday night fan awards seems the more likelier option.
But no matter. The chutzpah award goes to NQC. Or, as one person I talked to put it: “This is another fine example of the NQC trying to capitalize on something they didn’t create.” At least this has been the feeling for some time among many artists and some labels ever since NQC started charging admission to afternoon showcases several years ago. As the thinking goes here, it’s the artists and labels who are investing their time and losing paying gigs to put on the showcases, while the NQC gets a take at the gate that far exceeds the renumerative value of the showcase for the artist.
I’m not unsympathetic to this critique, but as it applies to the fan awards issues, I can see both sides of this. For the SN, there’s a matter of principle involved in NQC’s decision to make a drastic change to the SINGING NEWS fan awards without bothering to talk to . you know, THE SINGING NEWS. But more substantively, there’s the problem of Saturday night having become a sinkhole at NQC. With Gaither and his circle of talent gone, there’s no high profile act to anchor the weekends any more, so the fan awards have become the unofficial end of NQC. Everything else is just a long - and not very enjoyable - goodbye. And for the SN, there’s no guarantee that fans will want to stick around for a Saturday awards show no matter how sexed up and improved it is.
NQC, meanwhile, seems to have adapted the Field of Dreams approach to strategic planning and decided that if you move it they will come. This is not just a Saturday night or weekend attendance issue. One of worst kept secrets in sg is that NQC ticket sales have been in decline for seven years now, and on top of that, NQC lost a great deal of money on that AMG Dallas thing back in the spring. Desperate times and all that.
The younger members of the NQC
board shareholders (which now includes Stewart Varnado and Mark Trammell, I gather) probably see that if there’s any way to save NQC from obsolescence (not to mention their investment in the company), it’s going to involve mass-marketable products like the Fan Awards (and if you saw how slick this year’s show was, you might better understand why someone might think to pin his hopes on the awards show). Normally, I’d consider unilateralism of this sort bad form, and even worse strategy (see George Bush the Younger; 2001-Armaggeden). But in this case, I’m not so sure. If the SN is already talking about trying to reach a mutally agreeable solution with the NQC on day and time, it’s more likely not a matter of it, but how and when, the awards show will move.
Here’s where I reserve the right to change my mind because I’m hearing two different possibilities other than Thursday. One is a Saturday night awards show, which certainly wouldn’t seem like a bad idea on its face. If a marquee artist like Mark Lowry and his gang were scheduled for the mainstage after the awards show, it would be a package deal that’d certainly have a good chance of keeping a lot of butts in the seats and artists in their Exhibit Hall booths.
The Saturday afternoon option strikes me as much more problematic. The only thing more catastrophic than no one bothering to show up would be everyone turning out on Saturday afternoon for the awards and deciding to forgo a mainstage ticket for Saturday night. NQC gets a fat take at the awards-show gate that might offset or even overcome some of the Saturday night losses; but the general trend in Saturday night attendance and the stampede for the Exhibit Hall exit are only exacerbated. Meanwhile, the SN, INSP, and other investors in the awards show get no more money out of the move than before and so have good reason to feel royally jilted as NQC gets more bang for other people’s buck. Hurt feelings and cutthroat deals are part of the grown-up world (even and especially the grown up CHRISTIAN world), but the real rub here is that the SN and INSP could conceivably decide to break the fan awards off into its own separate event, which is bad news for those of us who put up with NQC’s many wondrous flaws because events like the fan awards are part of what helps keep Louisville in September the best one-stop shop for all things gospel music.
It’s probably a little soon for that kind of chicken-littling. The bottom line (and of course it’s about the bottom line with NQC, as it is with any other bidness) is that NQC has always had to dance deftly and sing prettily to give the appearance that what’s profitable for the quartet convention also coincides with what’s good for gospel music. At best this has never been more than a useful (and for some, a very lucrative) fiction. But the Gaither debacle eroded a chunk of NQC’s cultural authority as arbiters of taste in sg (to say nothing of it profit margins). It’s never wise to underestimate the power of a group of wealthy white southern men linked by a shared financial interest and a history of getting what they want. But then the SN isn’t owned by the chairman of the NQC board anymore and appears to have a powerful ally in the INSP network. Which may help put a little more “mutual” back into “mutually agreeable.”
Update: David Bruce Murray says “I told you so” and has some good thoughts on the way a fan awards change could play out (if you’re not exhausted by all this inside baseball yet). And reader vdieoguy has a simple solution here.
Later Update: Nothing to see here, folks. Jim Cumbee, publisher to the gospel stars and president of non-broadcast media at Salem (the Singing News’s parent company), writes to correct my “spurious” comments after the jump.
Email this Post
I normally don’t respond to spurious blog postings, but your post this afternoon about the NQC and the Singing News Fan Awards hit close to home with some bad information that needs to be clarified. There is a lot less intrigue in all of this than your post would suggest. The NQC and the Singing News are business and personal friends. We are in a normal dialogue with NQC leadership on a VARIETY of ways to improve the fan experience and I am completely confident that at the end of the day, the fan — and the music — will be better off.
The NQC has been the home of the Singing News Fan Awards for over 25 years. However, in today’s fast-changing business environment, you have to constantly re-consider your business model and core operating assumptions. That’s all that’s going on here. In fact, these are the same kind of decisions I make everyday in the many other businesses for which I am responsible. Change isn’t the “story” any more, it is the norm.
Having sat on the NQC Board for almost three years, I know that their deliberations are thoughtful and well intentioned. The Board is always looking at ways to strengthen the business by improving the fan experience. I am respectful of (and applaud) that way of thinking. It doesn’t mean I have to approve of every decision they make, I mean, really, if somebody looked over my shoulder to evaluate every decision I made in my various businesses, I’d never get anything done and they’d see a lot of mistakes. I figure if I get 7 out of 10 decisions right, I’m ahead of the game.
I’m sorry to take all the drama out of your post, but I want your readers to know what’s really going on here. Our open dialogue with the NQC Board will result in both businesses being better off, which is good for the music we love and the Lord we serve.