Comments on: Slightly OT: “Christvertising”

By: GospelMusicFan

GospelMusicFan — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:27:40 +0000

I giveth it and I can take it.

By: Charles Brady

Charles Brady — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:20:22 +0000

LOL!!! I understand Lee. I was just pulling that ole yankee’s chain for using my name in vain. LOL!!

By: Lee

Lee — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:41:05 +0000

Chuck, I don’t think that is what I had in mind but I do like the creativity.

By: Charles Brady

Charles Brady — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:27:58 +0000

Lee I like that idea so I’m going to use it for GospelMusicFan’s comment:

Numbers 22:28 “And the LORD opened the mouth of the ass”

By: Lee

Lee — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:17:50 +0000

I have a GREAT idea. Since we as Christians are supposed to have a divine perspective on things why not use the Word of the Divine prior to any entry on this blog and see how long people will last.

As a Bible teacher in a Christian High School I allowed my students to say anything they felt as long as they had scripture to back it up. This flew in the face of the principal but it did allow open thinking and taught my students to think in Biblical terms. Those who could not come up with Scripture to back their positions learned the value of remaining quiet until you have something of value to say.

I am not sure about the whole marketing thing but the scripture that comes to mind about this particular idea is that “where your treasure is there will your heart be.” I’ll let everybody else take it from here.

By: LW

LW — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:01:36 +0000

Amen!!!! JW!

By: GospelMusicFan

GospelMusicFan — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:00:52 +0000

The site should hire Charles Brady and Chuck Peters evangelical e-commerce marketing.
As for anything else, let’s not go there.

By: David Bruce Murray

David Bruce Murray — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:24:07 +0000

Well, I’m very offended. Under the “What” link, Van Pelt uses the term: “isoceles approach to marketing.”

It’s clearly an equilateral approach. Although equilateral technically applies qualifies as isoceles, it’s the more restrictive, specific and preferred term.

As a math parable, this site fails miserably. Math analogies should be more precise than this…heathen!!!

By: Robert

Robert — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:05:51 +0000

I have no doubt that God can take a joke but jokes are supposed to be funny. This one is not unless of course you are an atheist. Then it would probably only be mildly amusing.
What bothers me is someone went to great lengths to make fun of God.

By: JW

JW — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:32:09 +0000

“She can take a joke.” Yes, God is big, but God is holy. I have a sense of humor, but that’s just not cute or funny to me…and I’m beginning to wonder why any true Christians in the SG industry takes anything said here seriiously.

By: Scott

Scott — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:28:03 +0000

Chris–God is big. She can take a joke.

By: philo

philo — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:26:42 +0000

Listen up ,the guys right it’s perfect marketing because the premise is unproveable in human terms. It’s faith,trust,childlike if u prefer but hardly as sure as 2+2=4.Is it?

By: Chris

Chris — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:10:15 +0000

This can’t be legit. And I’m sure he’s not even saved. Would someone of the faith be so brazen as to vainly utter the name of deity in the name of a huge internet joke? i don’t even know how to respond to someone like this. “Keep your money in the flock, and only dring milk from a Christian cow.”