<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread</title>
	<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/</link>
	<description>Criticism and commentary on southern gospel music</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cam44</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-1022525</link>
		<dc:creator>cam44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-1022525</guid>
		<description>How about Michaela Brown?? Versus the previous "future" girls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Michaela Brown?? Versus the previous &#8220;future&#8221; girls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgmapopper</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-1022363</link>
		<dc:creator>sgmapopper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-1022363</guid>
		<description>So, Cincy SGfan, commenting on both Suzan AND Karlye- if I hear correctly Karlye is represented by Suzan's agency out of Nashville. Ironic isn't it? Never thought I'd see an open thread all on the "hottness of SG babes" but hey! Everythings gotta have a first right? Look up both of the women on facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Cincy SGfan, commenting on both Suzan AND Karlye- if I hear correctly Karlye is represented by Suzan&#8217;s agency out of Nashville. Ironic isn&#8217;t it? Never thought I&#8217;d see an open thread all on the &#8220;hottness of SG babes&#8221; but hey! Everythings gotta have a first right? Look up both of the women on facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iluvgospel</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-948528</link>
		<dc:creator>iluvgospel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-948528</guid>
		<description>Don't tell me you know what that means AFTER you google it, either!  Although it might be good to expand some vocab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t tell me you know what that means AFTER you google it, either!  Although it might be good to expand some vocab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iluvgospel</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-948030</link>
		<dc:creator>iluvgospel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-948030</guid>
		<description>Dear Heath (#25)  Mind your own stinking business!  I finally had a chance to talk to Ron and Trent Adams.  Truth:  Trent DID sign a contract with Ron. They discussed the best way to end it, and Ron let the young man go, chalking it up to his youth.  Truth: Trent Adams is back with Ron, doing a fabulous job.  He and Ron have a great relationship.  Truth: Trent is a married man who is in love with his wife. I don't need to know any more details and anyone who spreads any more than that is either a liar, a slanderous gossipmonger, or in your case, printing libelous twaddle. (do you even know what that means?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Heath (#25)  Mind your own stinking business!  I finally had a chance to talk to Ron and Trent Adams.  Truth:  Trent DID sign a contract with Ron. They discussed the best way to end it, and Ron let the young man go, chalking it up to his youth.  Truth: Trent Adams is back with Ron, doing a fabulous job.  He and Ron have a great relationship.  Truth: Trent is a married man who is in love with his wife. I don&#8217;t need to know any more details and anyone who spreads any more than that is either a liar, a slanderous gossipmonger, or in your case, printing libelous twaddle. (do you even know what that means?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-932580</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-932580</guid>
		<description>A... God &#38; dr joe reads everything!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A&#8230; God &amp; dr joe reads everything!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-932463</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-932463</guid>
		<description>I wonder if God would read these comments.. ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if God would read these comments.. ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sorrysocynical</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-929022</link>
		<dc:creator>sorrysocynical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-929022</guid>
		<description>Cynical..I was making a point on the immaturity of today's church, you read it wrong...of course I believe in the authority of all sciptures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynical..I was making a point on the immaturity of today&#8217;s church, you read it wrong&#8230;of course I believe in the authority of all sciptures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-928876</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-928876</guid>
		<description>CVH... yes she looks like a hottie... think I am going to send a reel to her talent agency... I listened to a bunch of the voices she had on the site and I think I could hang with all of them!! 

I am seeing 224 post on the main page but only see 222 on the thread. What's up with that???

But Karen Peck Gooochy Goo was always nice. Actually dated a girl named Karen Peck and when I heard the name of the new Soprano I went to see her and was surprised there were 2 HOT Karen Pecks... one looks like Amy Grant and one looks like Karen Peck!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CVH&#8230; yes she looks like a hottie&#8230; think I am going to send a reel to her talent agency&#8230; I listened to a bunch of the voices she had on the site and I think I could hang with all of them!! </p>
<p>I am seeing 224 post on the main page but only see 222 on the thread. What&#8217;s up with that???</p>
<p>But Karen Peck Gooochy Goo was always nice. Actually dated a girl named Karen Peck and when I heard the name of the new Soprano I went to see her and was surprised there were 2 HOT Karen Pecks&#8230; one looks like Amy Grant and one looks like Karen Peck!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CVH</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-928685</link>
		<dc:creator>CVH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-928685</guid>
		<description>May be the last word on this ponderous thread...

Suzan Speer is still hot.

We now return you to your regular blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be the last word on this ponderous thread&#8230;</p>
<p>Suzan Speer is still hot.</p>
<p>We now return you to your regular blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-926567</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-926567</guid>
		<description>Linda-

If you're a "5-point Calvinist", you really cannot accept the grace of God, nor the free will of man, nor the invitation to all to trust the Savior. You've locked yourself into a most uncomfortable box.

MacArthur also has a real problem with the eternal Sonship of the Lord Jesus.
He apparently doesn't believe He became the Son of God, until He bacame Son of Man.

However, on tongues, he is spot on. Guess it proves that we all have to be very careful who we listen to, who we read, and check everything out with the Word of God itself- the final arbiter.
Thanks for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda-</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a &#8220;5-point Calvinist&#8221;, you really cannot accept the grace of God, nor the free will of man, nor the invitation to all to trust the Savior. You&#8217;ve locked yourself into a most uncomfortable box.</p>
<p>MacArthur also has a real problem with the eternal Sonship of the Lord Jesus.<br />
He apparently doesn&#8217;t believe He became the Son of God, until He bacame Son of Man.</p>
<p>However, on tongues, he is spot on. Guess it proves that we all have to be very careful who we listen to, who we read, and check everything out with the Word of God itself- the final arbiter.<br />
Thanks for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gospeleer - The Perrys: Getting It Right!</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-926175</link>
		<dc:creator>Gospeleer - The Perrys: Getting It Right!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-926175</guid>
		<description>[...] was a discussion recently on Averyfineline about whether the Perry&#8217;s are &#8220;the best&#8221; in Southern Gospel. This kind of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was a discussion recently on Averyfineline about whether the Perry&#8217;s are &#8220;the best&#8221; in Southern Gospel. This kind of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Dillon</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-926004</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Dillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-926004</guid>
		<description>Joe, - #219

When this minister was hired, he said he was Calvinist, but the congregation did not totally understand what that meant.  We were doing the Beth Moore studies, and then he wanted to do all John MacArthur.  There is some information on John MacArthur's website if you search for election that seems to indicate he is thinking in that area.  

I like to discuss (not argue) points; however, the more I researched this point, the more depressed and sad I got.  I had to back away.  It was pulling me down.  As the assistant pastor said one Sunday, if we really believe that God sends some to hell, some to heaven, then we may as well went fishing this morning.  It's hard for me to understand why anyone would even bother with church activities if this decision had already been made.  They say that God is sovereign and he can do anything he wants.  I know God is sovereign and can do anything he wants, but he loved us so much he sent his only Son to take our sins upon himself.  Yes, he could choose to send me to Hell arbitrarily because he is sovereign, but the loving God I know gave me an option.  It's up to me which option I choose to take.  If I don't believe that, then I just don't see the point.  

I'm not knocking John MacArthur.  I have his Study Bible as well, and listen to him on his radio program; however, this theology baffles me to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, - #219</p>
<p>When this minister was hired, he said he was Calvinist, but the congregation did not totally understand what that meant.  We were doing the Beth Moore studies, and then he wanted to do all John MacArthur.  There is some information on John MacArthur&#8217;s website if you search for election that seems to indicate he is thinking in that area.  </p>
<p>I like to discuss (not argue) points; however, the more I researched this point, the more depressed and sad I got.  I had to back away.  It was pulling me down.  As the assistant pastor said one Sunday, if we really believe that God sends some to hell, some to heaven, then we may as well went fishing this morning.  It&#8217;s hard for me to understand why anyone would even bother with church activities if this decision had already been made.  They say that God is sovereign and he can do anything he wants.  I know God is sovereign and can do anything he wants, but he loved us so much he sent his only Son to take our sins upon himself.  Yes, he could choose to send me to Hell arbitrarily because he is sovereign, but the loving God I know gave me an option.  It&#8217;s up to me which option I choose to take.  If I don&#8217;t believe that, then I just don&#8217;t see the point.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not knocking John MacArthur.  I have his Study Bible as well, and listen to him on his radio program; however, this theology baffles me to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-925864</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-925864</guid>
		<description>Linda "215-

I went through the MacArthur Bible last night, looking at the passages on election, reading his textual notes. I honestly, so far, have not seen anything controversial.

It may actually be that this Baptist minister is a 5-point Calvinist, and is taking something he might have thought he heard or read from JM, to try to bolster his teachings.

Teaching election along with or part of salvation by grace is most dangerous. These people feel that since "only the elect shall be saved", there is no sense fulfilling the great commission, because the Lord will save Who He has elected, and it is not our worry.

Only one problem. We have no clue who "the elect" are, until we get saved, and understand that, by grace, I'm one of them.

The best illustration I ever heard was of a picture of salvation's Door (Christ Himself). As you stated, over the Door is "Whosoever will may come". By grace, and immeasurable mercy, I am allowed to come by faith, through that Door, and be saved. Once in, once saved, I turn around and read what is written over the INSIDE of the door: "chosen in Christ, from before the foundation of the world". THEN, I understand the secret of election. It is a family secret, for all who have been truly born again by grace.

But it is not for our burden to see lost souls saved. We are to preach Christ crucified, and what they do with the message is between their souls and God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda &#8220;215-</p>
<p>I went through the MacArthur Bible last night, looking at the passages on election, reading his textual notes. I honestly, so far, have not seen anything controversial.</p>
<p>It may actually be that this Baptist minister is a 5-point Calvinist, and is taking something he might have thought he heard or read from JM, to try to bolster his teachings.</p>
<p>Teaching election along with or part of salvation by grace is most dangerous. These people feel that since &#8220;only the elect shall be saved&#8221;, there is no sense fulfilling the great commission, because the Lord will save Who He has elected, and it is not our worry.</p>
<p>Only one problem. We have no clue who &#8220;the elect&#8221; are, until we get saved, and understand that, by grace, I&#8217;m one of them.</p>
<p>The best illustration I ever heard was of a picture of salvation&#8217;s Door (Christ Himself). As you stated, over the Door is &#8220;Whosoever will may come&#8221;. By grace, and immeasurable mercy, I am allowed to come by faith, through that Door, and be saved. Once in, once saved, I turn around and read what is written over the INSIDE of the door: &#8220;chosen in Christ, from before the foundation of the world&#8221;. THEN, I understand the secret of election. It is a family secret, for all who have been truly born again by grace.</p>
<p>But it is not for our burden to see lost souls saved. We are to preach Christ crucified, and what they do with the message is between their souls and God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tp</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-925669</link>
		<dc:creator>Tp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-925669</guid>
		<description>Does anybody know if Living Waters Trio still singing.I've tried to go to their web site and it is not working? I'm trying to find up coming shows and I cannot find them either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know if Living Waters Trio still singing.I&#8217;ve tried to go to their web site and it is not working? I&#8217;m trying to find up coming shows and I cannot find them either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynical one</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-925313</link>
		<dc:creator>cynical one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/06/07/1444/#comment-925313</guid>
		<description>Why can't we dwell more on the things we agree on, and less on what we disagree on?  Or is that just too boring?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t we dwell more on the things we agree on, and less on what we disagree on?  Or is that just too boring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

