<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moore or less predictable</title>
	<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/</link>
	<description>Criticism and commentary on southern gospel music</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sgnsider</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1035080</link>
		<dc:creator>sgnsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1035080</guid>
		<description>You wrote: "expecting sound political judgment out of someone b/c they’re a celebrity (religious or not, conservative or liberal) is rather like expecting to get sound financial advice from an ATM"

.......or like expecting a non-musical blogger to give an informed opinion on music</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote: &#8220;expecting sound political judgment out of someone b/c they’re a celebrity (religious or not, conservative or liberal) is rather like expecting to get sound financial advice from an ATM&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;.or like expecting a non-musical blogger to give an informed opinion on music</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McIlwain</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1033330</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McIlwain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1033330</guid>
		<description>I'm finding it interesting that states such as Hawaii are beginning to get in on the state's right issue. Many states in our country are moving this way because they can't afford all the mandates that the federal government is placing upon them.

I say let SG groups support who they want to support.  I know that there are various political opinions in SG music.  Hovie Lister was a Democrat and Scott Fowler is a Republican.  Each one is entitled to his own opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m finding it interesting that states such as Hawaii are beginning to get in on the state&#8217;s right issue. Many states in our country are moving this way because they can&#8217;t afford all the mandates that the federal government is placing upon them.</p>
<p>I say let SG groups support who they want to support.  I know that there are various political opinions in SG music.  Hovie Lister was a Democrat and Scott Fowler is a Republican.  Each one is entitled to his own opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1033257</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1033257</guid>
		<description>Jason, is there not a difference between 1865 and 2009? Dredging up one of the darkest eras in US history to make an argument nearly 150 years later seems a real stretch to me. Nor does one states' abuse of states' rights - if you're correct - negate the established fact that states do have Constitutional rights. The ATM line was priceless, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, is there not a difference between 1865 and 2009? Dredging up one of the darkest eras in US history to make an argument nearly 150 years later seems a real stretch to me. Nor does one states&#8217; abuse of states&#8217; rights - if you&#8217;re correct - negate the established fact that states do have Constitutional rights. The ATM line was priceless, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1033175</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1033175</guid>
		<description>Maybe because Alabama used the states' rights argument to restore white supremacy after the Civil War.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe because Alabama used the states&#8217; rights argument to restore white supremacy after the Civil War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1033122</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1033122</guid>
		<description>"...the tired old racist rhetoric of states’ rights"? When did something so basic and fundamental in the history of American governance become tired or especially, racist? Did I miss a redrawing of the tenth Amendment? "

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. "  (1791)

So, as I've always understood it, anything not specifically covered in the Constitution itself gives each state the right to pass their own laws. i.e., these are "states rights". Am I wrong?

Of course, so many things have been ignored and changed from the intent of the Constitution's framers. Note their collective wisdom reflected in the original term limits section! With the most important document in our nations' history being so abused over the last years, states' rights are even more critically important - and pronounced - today. And that is hardly tired, and much less so racist. I thought only Jimmy Carter could find racism where it ain't!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the tired old racist rhetoric of states’ rights&#8221;? When did something so basic and fundamental in the history of American governance become tired or especially, racist? Did I miss a redrawing of the tenth Amendment? &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. &#8221;  (1791)</p>
<p>So, as I&#8217;ve always understood it, anything not specifically covered in the Constitution itself gives each state the right to pass their own laws. i.e., these are &#8220;states rights&#8221;. Am I wrong?</p>
<p>Of course, so many things have been ignored and changed from the intent of the Constitution&#8217;s framers. Note their collective wisdom reflected in the original term limits section! With the most important document in our nations&#8217; history being so abused over the last years, states&#8217; rights are even more critically important - and pronounced - today. And that is hardly tired, and much less so racist. I thought only Jimmy Carter could find racism where it ain&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GospelMusicFan</title>
		<link>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1032934</link>
		<dc:creator>GospelMusicFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://averyfineline.com/2009/10/27/moore-or-less-predictable/#comment-1032934</guid>
		<description>I didn't have to email the host of this blog.
I knew what the answer would be.
Just what he wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t have to email the host of this blog.<br />
I knew what the answer would be.<br />
Just what he wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
