I really didn’t want to swallow this bug, but I was hoping they would’ve turned the volume down after reading your post. It’s a bug-eat-bug world out there, princess.

But I can hear the Master say, “Patience young grasshopper.” “The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug.”

Taking the site down would be a shame though(not that it’s even on the table)

You never know when you are gonna stumble upon something that’s a few years old that’ still relevant and helpful (like yukky tasting medicine)

In regards to sites being updated, I say yes and no. Some sites are great references even if they don’t get updated frequently. Some examples would be discography sites, Wikipedia etc. Blogs, message boards and the like although SHOULD have fresh content, are still interesting to read for people who missed things the first time, for historical purposes, or to check out memory on something seen there in the past. So, although I don’t agree with the “take them down if they aren’t going to be updated” crowd, there probably are some sites that really need to be.

Yikes!! The colors, the colors!!

It makes me wonder anyone choosing such a text color/background combination ever gets around to checking out their own website.

Perhaps he or she dreams of promoting a Florida Boys/Inspirations concert/fashion show someday.

While we’re on a roll, can we mount a similar effort to let website owners know how we feel about annoying graphics or animation, and (especially!) the use of white text against dark backgrounds.

Remember, webmasters everywhere: readibility is your friend. Inducing seizures among your readers is decidedly unfriendly (not to mention a poor business strategy).